Recovering a Heritage of Hymns, Part Two

Why Let It All Go?

One great advantage of classic hymns and gospel songs is that they allow our brothers and sisters of the past to encourage us.  Though they are dead, yet they speak (see Hebrews 11:4).  We can’t hear George Whitefield or Charles Spurgeon or Jonathan Edwards preach, but we can hear Charles Wesley, John Newton, and Martin Luther through the songs they wrote.  Singing connects us to the flow of church history and the work of the Holy Spirit in every age.  We don’t just hear about that history—we hear it, in the songs we sing.

The contemporary church, by and large, seem to be letting go of that heritage.  Many young people now leading worship services grew up with the contemporary style, and to them the old songs may seem hopelessly archaic, with its thee’s and thou’s, e’ens and –eth’s.   Who talks that way anymore?  And really, is it such a tragedy if the old songs are left behind?  Doesn’t every age produce bucketloads of songs that only last a generation or two?

They’ve lasted because they still speak
Fanny Crosby – “To God Be the Glory”

Indeed they do—and that’s all the more reason to pay attention to the ones that have lasted.  In any traditional hymnbook you will find words dating from 1500 years B.C. (the Psalms) to the early days of the church, through the early and late monastic periods, all the way through the Reformation and revivals of the 16-19th centuries.  They’ve lasted because they still speak.

Brothers and sisters, let’s not sell ourselves short—or our children.  It’s true that some of the lyrics of a song written in 1750 may not be instantly comprehendable, but they’re not obscure either.  If you can understand the Bible you can understand Isaac Watts.  Fanny J. Crosby is not beyond the comprehension of a five-year-old.  You will find, as you teach them to your children, that many of these songs have enormous staying power and will keep speaking long after most of this generation’s set of praise choruses have been forgotten.

Let us also allow our past to speak, as we locate ourselves in the mighty current of the Holy Spirit’s work from the beginning.

This is not to disallow praise choruses or new songs—let’s sing them loud and joyfully.  But let us also allow our past to speak, as we locate ourselves in the mighty current of the Holy Spirit’s work from the beginning until now.  Let’s include those voices as well as our own, and equip our children to write their songs, too, so the heritage will go on.  Hymnody (to use a classic churchy word) is not a wheel to be reinvented, but a wagon to keep rolling.  Or—to change the metaphor—a storehouse from which the householder takes treasures old and new (Mt. 13:52).

Recovering a Heritage of Hymns, Part One

Bible Challenge Week 47: The Church – By Faith Alone

“The plain things are the main things” in the Bible, but the plainest things present the church’s greatest challenges.  Last week, we looked at “Christ as the Center,” which is the theme of the entire scripture.  So why is it so hard to keep him there?  Mainly because we keep putting ourselves at the center.  The question of faith versus works, which has vexed the church from the beginning (we’ll be looking at Acts 15), is still an issue today.  What does “justification by faith” mean?  Why do Christians keep slipping off on one side of the other, toward legalism (attempting to earn heaven by good works) or antinomianism (living as we please while claiming to believe in Jesus)?

It would take more than one Bible lesson to do justice to that subject, but this week we’ll at least look at the root of the problem and the primary scriptural support.

For a download of this week’s challenge, with scripture references, key verse, discussion questions, and activities, click below:

Bible Reading Challenge Week 47: The Church – By Faith Alone

(This is a continuation of a series of posts about the “whole story” of the Bible.  I plan to run one every week, on Tuesdays, with a printable PDF.  The printable includes a brief 2-3 paragraph introduction, Bible passages to read, a key verse, 5-7 thought/discussion questions, and 2-3 activities for the kids.  Here’s the Overview of the entire Bible series.)

Previous: BRC Week 46: The Church – Christ the Center

Next: BRC Week 48: The Church – God’s Family

 

 

Recovering a Heritage of Hymns, Part One

(Beginning a series of  posts about how church music ain’t what it used to be and what’s maybe not-so-great about that)

A Tuneful History

Picture America in the Year of Our Lord 1801.

What began as thirteen colonies is now fifteen “United States.”  The nation is twenty-four years old, its Constitution has been in effect for a little over ten years.  Thomas Jefferson is president, and before the end of his first term he will double the territorial size of the United States by negotiating the Louisiana Purchase.  But even before they had a legal right to, Americans were moving westward, forming settlements and establishing towns.  Every town had at least one church, and soon three or four.

It was the same in the towns they came from: church was the heartbeat of every community, where births were recorded, marriages performed, and funerals preached.  The building with the steeple also served as an assembly hall for political and social gatherings, such as the weekly “sing.”  Almost everyone sang, for worship and for fun, both secular and sacred, Sundays and Wednesdays and days in between.

In the scattered communities springing up all over the west, many churches didn’t have a pianist to accompany their singing, and often they didn’t have a piano.  (Pianos are notoriously hard to transport, especially over the mountains.)  Aside from the occasional fiddle or fife, the human voice was the only instrument available.  But along with their cookware and bags of meal, settlers carried with them a system of singing introduced by a book called The Easy Instructor, published in Boston in 1801.  This is the first published resource for what came to be called “shape-note singing.”

The basic idea is to assign a distinctive shape to each pitch on the do-re-mi scale.  Singers who could not read music (that is, recognize pitches by the notes’ position on a five-line staff) would locate pitch by the shape.  There’s more than one shape-note system, but this one is standard:

Shape-note singing began in New England but went west with the pioneers and found a permanent home in the south.  To get a taste of it, search YouTube for “shape-note singing” and choose among the many associations and clubs (and even churches) that still practice it.  The style is loud, brassy, somewhat harsh and not like anything else.  It’s not to everyone’s taste, but it’s a link to our past that we can still hear.

So are traditional hymns and psalters, and like shape-note singing, the contemporary church may be close to leaving them behind for good.

* * * * * * * * * * *

A personal recollection: I grew up in the non-instrumental Church of Christ, singing out of a shape-note hymnbook.  Church was the pivot of every week: Sunday morning, Sunday evening, and Wednesday night, we were there.  At every Sunday service, morning and evening, the pattern was the same—three songs before the sermon, an invitation song after the sermon, a song of meditation before the Lord’s super, and a song of dismissal.  On Wednesdays, a devotional service after classes, with two songs, a brief message, an invitation, and a dismissal.

That was a lot of singing!

The first thing visitors noticed when worship started was the absence of a piano, organ, or choir.  And the second thing visitors noticed was the power of the singing, especially in an assembly of 100 or more.  The harsh, clanging chords of traditional shape-note singing had smoothed out somewhat, but echoes of it lingered, as they do even today.  Life-long members of the Church of Christ had sung a cappella from childhood.  You heard the parts.  More importantly, you heard the voices.

And you heard some good songs.  Some cheesy, slap-happy, or spooky ones, too—I remember one about the “All-seeing eye watching you”—but we also sang “My Hope is Built on Nothing Less” and “Abide with Me” and “Rock of Ages”—time-tested classics with sound theology.  Those words sank deep within my consciousness, to be recalled later with waves of meaning and emotion.  I will always be grateful for this: the melodies and lyrics I never forgot.

In 1970 I enrolled at Abilene Christian College, where a fresh wind was blowing.  Nobody wanted to sing those stodgy old hymns anymore: we were singin’ and swayin’ to “My Sweet Lord” by George Harrison and “O Happy Day” as recorded by the Edwin Hawkins Singers.  And how about Jesus Christ Superstar?  That blew us away!  “I Don’t Know How to Love Him”—remember?

You don’t?

In the late seventies my husband and I attended a house church where we sang slow, meditative Psalm adaptations to basic chords strummed on a guitar.  We loved “Day by Day” and “Prepare the Way of the Lord” (from the musical Godspell) and songs about fellowship and community.  “They’ll Know We Are Christians by Our Love”—can you hear that one in your head right now?

You can’t?

In the late eighties we joined a startup Orthodox Presbyterian Church that met in a school cafeteria.  Most of the other members were of our own age.  At that time the church could not afford hymn books, so the music director inserted praise choruses (mostly Psalm-based) among the classic hymns that were printed in each week’s bulletin.  At one informal Sunday evening service, one of the brothers brought a guitar and suggested we sing some of the good old classics that we’d sung in the sixties.

No one knew any of them.

What’s my point?  That every new generation of Christians now seems to be developing its own songbook and the songs usually don’t outlast that generation.  In fact, since they’re not printed on paper but shown on a screen, they might not even outlast this generation.  The meditative quality of the words (enhanced by repetition) and the random pattern of the music make some of them as forgettable as a movie soundtrack.

Movie soundtracks are for producing a mood, and certainly it’s important to calm our hearts and shut out worldly concerns when we come together to worship God.  And yet, according to the Scriptures, that’s not entirely what our singing is for.  According to the Scriptures, our songs are addressed not only to God, but also to each other (Eph. 5:18-21).  They are for teaching, admonishing, correcting, and encouraging, drawing us all together with one voice as we offer our sacrifices of praise.

There’s no need to pitch the new songs.  But there’s also no need to pitch the old ones either: in fact, we might be carelessly tossing out a priceless heritage our children and grandchildren will never get back.  I believe there are good reasons not to do that . . .

Next week: Why Let It All Go?

 

Bible Challenge Week 46: The Church – Christ the Center

We have one more month of this series to go!  This week, we move out of the historical record (Matthew – Acts) and into the part of the Bible known as “Epistles,” or letters to the very first churches established in Asia and Europe.  I find it interesting, and significant, that the historical record does not come to a strong, ringing conclusion.  The book of Acts ends with Paul in Rome under house arrest, arguing the claims of Christ with anyone who came to visit   That’s not the conclusion we’re looking for–what happened to Paul, and Peter, and the other apostles?  Where’s the big victory at the end, the soul-stirring, confetti-flinging, music-swelling ending?

What we need to remember is that the story does not end with Acts 28:31,  The story is ongoing.  We are the story now.  The Bible does come to a ringing conclusion in Revelation, which we’ll get to, but that ending is not yet.  We are living in the in-between time, where God’s story is still being written in our hearts and lives.  From that perspective, Romans – Jude are like author notes for the major themes of the story.  What are those themes?  The greatest comes first, and we’ll look at that one this week.

For a printable download of this week’s reading challenge, including scripture references, discussion questions, and family activities, click here:

Bible Reading Challenge Week 46: The Church – Christ the Center

(This is a continuation of a series of posts about the “whole story” of the Bible.  I plan to run one every week, on Tuesdays, with a printable PDF.  The printable includes a brief 2-3 paragraph introduction, Bible passages to read, a key verse, 5-7 thought/discussion questions, and 2-3 activities for the kids.  Here’s the Overview of the entire Bible series.)

Previous: BRC Week 45: The Church – to the Uttermost Parts of the Earth

Next: BRC Week 47: The Church – by Faith Alone

Who Invented Writing? And Why Does the Bible Not Care?

From this . . .

The answer to the first question is, nobody knows.  It’s apparently a Sumerian invention, adapted by the Akkadians and picked up by all Middle Eastern cultures.  The Phoenicians get credit for developing the first alphabet (22 letters), but it was really a mashup of Egyptian and Sumerian.  The Hebrews weren’t far behind, and the Greeks invented vowels.  Most of these cultures had some kind of origin story: writing as the gift of a god or demi-god.  In the “Phaedrus” dialogue, Socrates tells of the god Theuth, who talked up his invention to the Pharaoh as an aid to wisdom and memory.  The King was not impressed; he perceived the written word not as an aid but as a crutch:

By telling them many things without teaching them you will make them seem to know much, while for the most part they know nothing, and as men filled, not with wisdom but with the conceit of wisdom, they will be a burden to their fellows.

That’s a good description of pretentious windbaggery, and may be one reason why the Bible makes no mention of how writing was invented.  Nobody writes anything in Genesis.  In Exodus, there it is: Ten Commandments written by God himself and a Torah written by Moses (who was, after all, schooled in all the arts of a sophisticated culture).  Written words are a medium for the Word, but not, strictly speaking, the Word Himself.  (Remember, Jesus never wrote anything—recorded for us, that is—except some mysterious words in the sand.)

. . . to this . . .

While the slow and tortuous development of writing went on, God spoke—to Noah, Abraham, Jacob, finally Moses.  With the alphabet in place, he instructed prophets to set things down, not for their own erudition and proof-texting, but to let his people know what he was like.  Like all technologies, writing is a double-edged sword, though more subtle than most: by it we pass down vital knowledge, and by it we’re burdened with conceited pedagogues.

Writing is a tool, not a talisman.

Of course God knows that.  Knowledge is a means, not an end.  Writing is a tool, not a talisman.  It sets us free from immediate practical application and the limits of an individual mind, creates a place for the expression of ideas in a world of “things.”  It also makes us think we know more than we actually do, when what it’s actually doing is setting the table for genuine knowledge.  God doesn’t need it; his words endure even when no on

. . . to this?

e listens to them.  But our words are airy and fleeting.  Like rain, they fall and evaporate on the heads of our hearers.  Good words can bless, and evil words can hurt, but that depends on who hears them and what frame of mind they’re in.

Writing is our one shot at making our words endure past the hearing.  But the Pharaoh’s words to Theuth—actually Socrates’ words—hold just as true today: reading and understanding the content represented by a pattern of words on a page makes us think we know the content.  We don’t really know anything unless we live it out.  That’s why the Bible puts such importance on doing: “Be doers of the word, and not hearers [or readers] only.”  “He who hears my words and does them is like a man who built his house on a rock.”

Writing is a tremendous gift, no question.  I make my living by it.  Like all gifts, though, it’s not to be worshiped or exalted for its own sake, only for how it brings us closer to God.

 

Bible Challenge Week 45: The Church – To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth

It was to Peter that Jesus gave “the keys to the Kingdom,” to unlock doors previously closed.  The door was the good news of the gospel, first open to the Jews, and then to the Gentiles.  Peter opened both doors.  But the one who stormed through the second one was the young man called Saul, later an old man known to us as “Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ.”  In a total of four journeys, he would carry the gospel of Christ all the way to the capital of the Empire, and maybe even beyond.

It’s an exciting story we unfortunately don’t have the time to tell in one session.  But for a printable one-page download of this week’s challenge, with scripture passages to read, questions to discuss, and family activities, click here:

Bible Reading Challenge Week 45: The Church – to the Uttermost Parts of the Earth

(This is a continuation of a series of posts about the “whole story” of the Bible.  I plan to run one every week, on Tuesdays, with a printable PDF.  The printable includes a brief 2-3 paragraph introduction, Bible passages to read, a key verse, 5-7 thought/discussion questions, and 2-3 activities for the kids.  Here’s the Overview of the entire Bible series.)

Previous: Week 44: The Church – To the Gentiles

Next: Week 46: The Church – Christ the Center

Why Time?

The whole creation project hangs on it.  For anything to be created, there has to be the possibility of it not being created.  Anything that “comes to be” must come to be in time.  God is not an exception because he is automatically excluded; he doesn’t “come” to be; he just is.  Even describing him as eternal, as the classic confessions do, is inadequate.  Eternity has direction; it always goes forward (for everything except God), and going forward requires a sense of time.  Before creation, no time, though our minds are not able to grasp it.  We can’t even speak theoretically of it, without words like before, when, pre-, post-, or during barging into the conversation—try it.  We have to take God’s timelessness on faith because there’s no other way to take it, and yet no other assumption is possible.  His first creation was time.  Then imperishable spirits, then perishable matter.

He could have stopped with angels, with countless multitudes spun from his glory, giving back his praises, alive in endless bliss.

So why didn’t he?  Why does his Spirit hover at this turning called “the beginning,” brooding over darkness?  Why does the word come: “Let there be light”?  (Especially from one who already is light?)

How about this: He wants to tell a story.

To time he adds space: three actual dimensions to hold actual objects.  The first objects are foundational: earth and sky.  From there he builds up to relational and consequences and progress—things stir, grow, feed, reproduce—die? (Maybe not yet.)  A fabric of cause-and-effect covers the earth like a mat.  Sun meets bud—more flowers. Root meets earth—more grass.  Bull meets heifer—you get the idea.  What’s needed now is a willful being who will make real choices with real consequences, who will act and be acted upon, whose actions will form a coherent narrative with a beginning, a middle, and an end.

We call that a story.

Someone told me once, God loves a good story.  Don’t we all?

Some theologians speculate that Satan did not fall until after the creation of humans.  He rebelled not because of a desire to usurp the throne, but because of revulsion at being expected to serve these puny beings.  Humans were the prime cause of his defection, not the Almighty.  I don’t know if that’s true–Isaiah 14:12 suggests there’s more to it.  But it’s an interesting thought: what if Satan didn’t become part of the story until there was a story?  Then he assumed an antagonist role, infiltrated earth, told the biggest whopper of all time and bound himself to the consequences.  What if?

One common complaint about God—if he’s just up there somewhere, entertaining himself with our misfortunes like some Game of Thrones fan, then I want nothing to do with him.  But to say he loves a good story doesn’t mean we are a mere diversion.  It means that Story itself is far more significant than we ever thought, a grand sweeping narrative that is as much for us as it is for him.  It shapes us, makes us, and in the next life it will amaze us forever.

And it all began with Let there be . . .  Which may be another way of saying, Once upon a time . . .

You’ve Got a Lot of Nerve

Arise, O Lord, in your anger;

Lift yourself up against the fury of my enemies

Awake for me; you have appointed a judgment . . .  (Psalm 7:6, “of David”)

Who does this “of David” character think he is?  He seems to believe that the Creator and Master of the universe, of the sky with its stars and the sea with its endless waves, is at his beck and call.  He has no qualms about marching up to heaven’s gate and yanking on the bell pull, yelling, “Wake up!”  Then he lays out a case, such as it is:  “I’m the righteous one; they’re the bad guys.  Whose side are You on?”

What nerve!

David was a pretty nervy guy, and it didn’t always put him on the side of the angels.  But this Psalm and many others demonstrate where his boldness came from.  First, confidence (whoever calls on the Lord must believe he exists), then acknowledgment (God is a righteous judge), dependence (Save and Deliver me!) and vulnerability (Judge me according to my righteousness).  If he seems cocky, he knows where Square One is.  If he seems full of himself . . . it’s not really himself he’s full of.  What makes David a man after God’s own heart, rather than just a blowhard, opportunist, or bully, is that he’s after God’s own heart.

No one is more real to him.  If the Lord demands nothing greater than faith from David, then David delivers.  By faith he demands great things from God, like the terrified disciples crying out, “Master, wake up!  Don’t you care if we all drown?”  Or the widow who makes a pest of herself, knocking and insisting and demanding until the judge finally gives in.

They’ve got a lot of nerve, and so do we, if we’d only recognize and make use of it.

Bible Challenge Week 44: The Church – to the Gentiles

The shocking death of Stephen acted like a catapult, flinging Christians out from Jerusalem in all directions.  That was God’s purpose, to carry out the next stage of his plan.  That next stage shouldn’t have been a surprise–the LORD had been hinting about it at least as far back as Abraham: “In you all nations shall be blessed.”  Prophets from Jonah to Isaiah had prophesied about God’s mercy extending beyond the Jews, out to “the nations.”  But as usual, the disciples were slow to catch on, including Peter.

What God is about to do will cause anger, confusion and bewilderment . . and finally acceptance.  In the 2000 years since, all nations have indeed been blessed.

To find out more, click below for the printable .pdf, with scripture references, discussion questions, and activities:

Bible Reading Challenge Week 44: The Church – To the Gentiles

(This is a continuation of a series of posts about the “whole story” of the Bible.  I plan to run one every week, on Tuesdays, with a printable PDF.  The printable includes a brief 2-3 paragraph introduction, Bible passages to read, a key verse, 5-7 thought/discussion questions, and 2-3 activities for the kids.  Here’s the Overview of the entire Bible series.)

Previous: Week 43: The Church – From Jerusalem to Samaria

Next: Week 45: The Church – To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth

Take Their Place–or Take YOUR Place?

Here’s a little vignette from higher education: In the surgical theater of one of the teaching hospitals at Harvard medical school, several portraits of prominent physicians will be removed from their current grouping and placed elsewhere. The decision is more political (for lack of a better word) than aesthetic.  The docs are white and male, and all that massed masculine whiteness is intimidating to women.  Not that any female residents have complained; it seems to be an ideological decision.Image result for Harvard medical school teaching hospital portraits removed

The men so honored are described as pioneers of medicine, going back to the days when the profession was all but exclusively male.  There were reasons for that, besides discrimination.  Discrimination certainly existed–most of these men were only a generation removed from a time when women were considered less rational, intelligent, stable, and hardy than men.  But practically speaking, only a hundred years ago it would have been hard to be married (as most women were) and a full-time physician.  It would have been impossible to bear and raise children (as most women did) and work as a full-time physician.  One requirement of pioneering is being first to show up for it.

Now many more women are involved in medicine because they can be.  They can even be pioneers.  The way to encourage them is not to remove the old pioneers from places they earned, but to encourage new ones to take their own places.  There’s more than one way to look at an assembly of faces that seem to be too much of one color or sex.  You can see those white-coated authority figures, however pleasant they appear, as old curmudgeons keeping you down–even if many of them are currently six feet under.  Or you can see them as leading the way.  For you.  The former is solipsistic and limiting: history really isn’t about you, sister.  The latter is inspirational and challenging–you go, girl!  That surgical procedure developed by Dr. X, that tool designed by Dr. Y, sets you up for taking the next step forward.

The main hallway of my local hospital is lined with photos of the resident physicians.  Most of them are white and male, but more and more women are taking their places among them.  That will continue, and the pioneering business will continue as well–but not by stomping old pioneers out of memory.